General Counsel, P.C.

  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Business Breakups in Virginia
      • Minority Shareholder Protections
      • Emerging Companies
      • Entity Formation
      • Foreign Companies Entering U.S. Market
      • Real Estate and Leases
      • Starting a Business, Licensing & Compliance
      • Registered Agent Services
      • Succession Planning for Business Owners
      • Tax Law Matters
      • Charitable Solicitation Practice Group
      • Intellectual Property
        • Trade Secrets
        • Copyright
        • Trademark
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Documentation
        • Building Your Cornerstone
        • Employee Document Vault
        • Employee Handbook Tuneup Services
        • Guidelines for Hiring or Firing Employees
        • Separation Agreements
      • Drug Testing
        • Drug Testing Your Workforce – Best Practices
        • Laws Affecting Drug Testing Policies
      • Regulatory Issues
        • VA, MD, DC, Rights & Obligations
        • Age Discrimination
        • Americans with Disabilities Act
        • At-Will Employment
        • Fair Labor Standards Act
        • Family Medical Leave Act
        • Pregnancy Discrimination Act
        • Title VII
      • Non-Competition Agreements
        • District of Columbia
        • Maryland
        • Virginia
      • For Employers of Uniformed Services Members
      • Employer Considerations For Government Contractors
      • For Non-Profits
    • Family Law
      • Divorce
        • Grounds for Divorce
          • Fourth Level Menu Sample
        • High Net Divorce
        • Same Sex Divorce
        • Military Divorce
        • Uncontested Divorce
        • Litigation vs. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Divorce
        • Post-Divorce Enforcement and Appeals
        • Alimony and Spousal Support
        • Child Custody
        • Child Support
        • Filing for Divorce in Virginia
        • Divorce Security Clearance
      • Property Division
      • Alimony and Spousal Support
      • Child Support
      • Child Custody and Visitation
      • Marital Agreements
      • International Family Law
      • Domestic Violence and Protective Orders
      • Co-Parenting in Virginia
    • Government Contracts
      • Bid Protests
      • Government Contract Claims and Appeals
      • Getting Government Contracts: Small Business Certification Services
        • 8(a) Small Business
        • HUBZone Small Business
        • SDVOSB Program
        • Veteran-Owned Small Business
        • Women-Owned Small Business
    • Litigation
      • Arbitration, Mediation & Alternative Dispute Resolution Attorneys
      • Commercial & Business Litigation
      • Defamation
      • Employment Disputes
      • Government Contracting Disputes
      • Intellectual Property Disputes
      • Local Counsel
      • Pre-Litigation
    • Estate Planning
      • Estate Planning FAQs
      • Trusts
      • Wills
      • Families With Children
      • Business Succession Planning
      • Asset Protection Planning
      • Celebrity Estate Planning Mistakes
      • Legal Business Contingency Plans
      • Become a Referral Partner
    • Probate Administration
      • Probate is Complex – FAQ and Answers
      • Trust & Estate Litigation
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Biographies
      • Andrew “Andy” Baxter
      • Matthew Brennan
      • Heba K. Carter
      • Joanna Foard
      • Erika Gnazzo
      • Merritt Green
      • Elizabeth Hart
      • David Kaye
      • Craig Lawless
      • David Proano
      • Evan St. John
    • How We Help
  • Resources
    • Practical Counsel Blog
    • Bid Protest Weekly
    • VetWorking
    • COVID Compliance Plans
    • Virginia COVID Workplace Safety and Health Standards
    • Video Library
    • Webinars
    • Quotes in The News
    • GCPC First Generation Law Student Scholarship
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Make Payments
703-556-0411

Virginia Court Upholds 1-Year, 50-Mile Radius Non-Compete Agreement For National Staffing Company

Tuesday, 03 July 2018 / Published in Labor & Employment

Virginia Court Upholds 1-Year, 50-Mile Radius Non-Compete Agreement For National Staffing Company

In a recently decided case, Update Inc. v. Samilow, the Eastern District of Virginia held that a non-compete agreement with a one-year duration and 50 miles from any office geographic scope was enforceable. There, the plaintiff, Update, Inc. (“Update”), employed defendant, Lawrence Samilow. Update provides eDiscovery and legal staffing services throughout the United States. Samilow was employed as Chief Customer Officer and was responsible for developing new sales opportunities, managing client relationships, customer service for New York and New Jersey clients, and supervision of national sales. After working for Update, Inc. for over 20 years, Samilow’s employment ended.

Soon after his employment ended, Samilow started a new business, within 50 miles of Update’s New York headquarters, providing eDiscovery services similar to those provided by Update. Around the same time, Update was acquired by Driven, Inc. and Samilow proposed to Driven, Inc. that all eDiscovery clients he had been servicing personally be moved to his new business, but Driven rejected the proposal. Samilow then solicited a client he had worked with during his employment with Update. Update sued Samilow for breaching the non-competition and non-solicitation agreements. At the time of trial, Samilow was providing services for two of Update’s clients, performing services similar to those provided by Update, and had specifically diverted a large project from Update.

Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements

Virginia utilizes a three-part test for determining the enforceability of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. Under this test, a non-compete agreement must be (1) narrowly drawn to protect the employer’s legitimate business interest; (2) not unduly burdensome on the employee’s ability to earn a living; and (3) not against sound public policy. This requires consideration of the agreement’s “restriction in terms of function, geographic scope, and duration.”

Duration of Non-Compete

The court held that Update, Inc. had a legitimate interest in protecting itself from losing potential work to competitors through employees who complete against it using the business knowledge and contacts they acquired as employees. The non-compete and non-solicitation clauses served that purpose. The court found that the one-year duration of the clauses is reasonable, in light of the fact that Update “invests significant resources in its legal services clients and built relationships with many of them” through Samilow’s work on behalf of Update. The court determined that one-year allows Update a reasonable time to convince customers to remain with the company without interference from Samilow.

Geographic Scope of Non-Compete

Additionally, the court found the geographic scope of 50 miles from any office, branch office, or production facility reasonable. While, such a large geographic scope may not be appropriate in all circumstances, the court noted that “where, as here, the employee has company-wide knowledge about customers and sales practices” the Supreme Court of Virginia has upheld even less definite geographic restrictions. For example, the court previously upheld a non-compete clause that referred to “all territory” covered by the former employer, since the employee had company-wide knowledge that allowed him to compete nationally. Here, Samilow’s role required him to provide personal customer service to New York and New Jersey customers and was informed about customer information across Update’s national operations. Moreover, his new business had a “national practice.” In light of the company-wide knowledge standard, a 50-mile radius from any office was deemed reasonable, because it only covered the territories in which Update conducts business and in which Samilow conducted business.

Functional Scope of Non-Compete

The court also found that the functional scope of the clauses was reasonable, in light of Samilow’s former role at Update. The non-solicitation agreement prohibited solicitation of clients in geographic areas that would compete with Update and of former clients with whom Samilow worked. Additionally, it only bared solicitation for the purposes of diverting or taking away business from Update, Inc., and not mere contact with former or possible clients. The court found the agreement was reasonable because the scope was limited only to solicitation that “takes business away from the employer.” The non-compete agreement was further limited to prohibit only the types of services and activities that were included with Samilow’s job description in his job offer, and didn’t include services that fell outside the scope of his former role at Update.

What Does Update, Inc. Mean for Employers?

Courts determine the enforceability of a non-compete agreement on a case-by-case basis, based on what is reasonable and narrowly tailored in light of specific circumstances. Due to the fact intensive inquiry each case requires, the court’s finding in Update, Inc. can’t be interpreted as applicable to all non-competes across Virginia. However, it may be illustrative of how the court will view non-competes in similar employment scenarios. Where as here, an employee gains company-wide knowledge from a national company and information about clients nationally, the court was willing to enforce a geographic scope of 50 miles from any office nationally.

Ensuring that a non-compete is sufficiently “narrowly tailored” can make or break the agreement’s enforceability. Attorneys at General Counsel PC have experience walking the fine line of protecting a wide range of employer interests and remaining narrowly tailored. Call General Counsel PC at 703-556-0411 today to see how we can help you.

  • Tweet

TOP ARTICLE CATEGORIES

  • BUSINESS

  • COVID-19

  • LABOR & EMPLOYMENT

  • FAMILY LAW

  • GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

  • LITIGATION

Subscribe to Blogs and Updates

Address:

6849 Old Dominion Dr #220
McLean, VA 22101

Hours of Operation:

Mon – Fri, 8AM – 5PM

Phone Number:

+1 703-556-0411


  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • DISCLAIMER
  • SITEMAP
  • CONTACT US
  • MAKE A PAYMENT

General Counsel, P.C. BBB Business Review

© 2023 General Counsel, P.C. | Website Design & Development by High Level Thinkers

TOP