General Counsel, P.C.

  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Business Breakups in Virginia
      • Minority Shareholder Protections
      • Emerging Companies
      • Entity Formation
      • Foreign Companies Entering U.S. Market
      • Real Estate and Leases
      • Starting a Business, Licensing & Compliance
      • Registered Agent Services
      • Succession Planning for Business Owners
      • Tax Law Matters
      • Charitable Solicitation Practice Group
      • Intellectual Property
        • Trade Secrets
        • Copyright
        • Trademark
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Documentation
        • Building Your Cornerstone
        • Employee Document Vault
        • Employee Handbook Tuneup Services
        • Guidelines for Hiring or Firing Employees
        • Separation Agreements
      • Drug Testing
        • Drug Testing Your Workforce – Best Practices
        • Laws Affecting Drug Testing Policies
      • Regulatory Issues
        • VA, MD, DC, Rights & Obligations
        • Age Discrimination
        • Americans with Disabilities Act
        • At-Will Employment
        • Fair Labor Standards Act
        • Family Medical Leave Act
        • Pregnancy Discrimination Act
        • Title VII
      • Non-Competition Agreements
        • District of Columbia
        • Maryland
        • Virginia
      • For Employers of Uniformed Services Members
      • Employer Considerations For Government Contractors
      • For Non-Profits
    • Family Law
      • Divorce
        • Grounds for Divorce
          • Fourth Level Menu Sample
        • High Net Divorce
        • Same Sex Divorce
        • Military Divorce
        • Uncontested Divorce
        • Litigation vs. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Divorce
        • Post-Divorce Enforcement and Appeals
        • Alimony and Spousal Support
        • Child Custody
        • Child Support
        • Filing for Divorce in Virginia
        • Divorce Security Clearance
      • Property Division
      • Alimony and Spousal Support
      • Child Support
      • Child Custody and Visitation
      • Marital Agreements
      • International Family Law
      • Domestic Violence and Protective Orders
      • Co-Parenting in Virginia
    • Government Contracts
      • Bid Protests
      • Government Contract Claims and Appeals
      • Getting Government Contracts: Small Business Certification Services
        • 8(a) Small Business
        • HUBZone Small Business
        • SDVOSB Program
        • Veteran-Owned Small Business
        • Women-Owned Small Business
    • Litigation
      • Arbitration, Mediation & Alternative Dispute Resolution Attorneys
      • Commercial & Business Litigation
      • Defamation
      • Employment Disputes
      • Government Contracting Disputes
      • Intellectual Property Disputes
      • Local Counsel
      • Pre-Litigation
    • Estate Planning
      • Estate Planning FAQs
      • Trusts
      • Wills
      • Families With Children
      • Business Succession Planning
      • Asset Protection Planning
      • Celebrity Estate Planning Mistakes
      • Legal Business Contingency Plans
      • Become a Referral Partner
    • Probate Administration
      • Probate is Complex – FAQ and Answers
      • Trust & Estate Litigation
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Biographies
      • Andrew “Andy” Baxter
      • Matthew Brennan
      • Heba K. Carter
      • Joanna Foard
      • Erika Gnazzo
      • Merritt Green
      • Elizabeth Hart
      • David Kaye
      • Craig Lawless
      • David Proano
      • Evan St. John
    • How We Help
  • Resources
    • Practical Counsel Blog
    • Bid Protest Weekly
    • VetWorking
    • COVID Compliance Plans
    • Virginia COVID Workplace Safety and Health Standards
    • Video Library
    • Webinars
    • Quotes in The News
    • GCPC First Generation Law Student Scholarship
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Make Payments
703-556-0411

Proposed Change to FAR Seeks to Revise Protest and Appeal Procedures for Small Business Size and Status Protests

Monday, 11 March 2013 / Published in Government Contract Law

Proposed Change to FAR Seeks to Revise Protest and Appeal Procedures for Small Business Size and Status Protests

On March 7, 2013, a proposed rule was released seeking to amend several clauses of the FAR addressing protests and appeals of small business size and status, in order to bring them in line with SBA regulations. “The objective of these changes is to provide in the FAR, procedures to assure that contracts set-aside for small businesses are awarded to eligible small businesses.” 78 FR 14746. The proposed rule suggests that it will indirectly benefit legitimate small business concerns by preventing awards of small business set-asides to ineligible companies. The proposed rule targets businesses that are not small or ineligible in terms of status as a HUBZone, service-disabled veteran-owned (SDVOSB), or women-owned small business (WOSB).

Where a protest is filed with a contracting officer challenging the size of a business holding itself out to be a small business, the contracting officer must refer the size protest to the SBA. Under the existing FAR clause (FAR § 19.302), the SBA must issue a size determination within 10 business days. If the SBA does not issue its size determination within that 10 day period, the contracting officer may proceed with award to the challenged firm.

In an effort to ensure the SBA has time to issue a proper determination, the proposed rule increases the amount of time given to the SBA to make a size determination to 15 business days. In addition, the proposed rule gives contracting officers the ability to grant an extension to the SBA to make its size determination. If the SBA does not issue its size determination within the 15 day period, or within any granted extension period, the proposed rule prevents contracting officers from proceeding with an award to the challenged firm unless he or she determines in writing that waiting for the SBA determination will be disadvantageous to the Government. The new rule also allows the SBA, on its own initiative, to reopen a formal size determination to correct an error or mistake.

The proposed rule also addresses protests of a firm’s status as either a HUBZone small business (FAR § 19.306), an SDVOSB (FAR § 19.307), or a WOSB (FAR § 19.308). The proposed revisions address:

  • The information that must be included with the protest;
  • The time frames for submittal of a protest by an interested parties (generally 5 days);
  • The actions the contracting officer must take before and after receiving an SBA determination;
  • The actions the contracting officer must take if there has or has not been a timely appeal filed;
  • The requirements for concerns determined by the SBA to be ineligible in either size or status to represent itself under one of the SBA small business categories.

The new regulations in the proposed rule do not appear to impose any new burden on small businesses wishing to file a size or status protest. Rather, the new regulations aim to unify the FAR with SBA regulations, and increase the possibility that a procurement set-aside for small business is actually awarded to a small business.

The proposed rule released on March 7, 2013 is open for public comment for 60 days, which will close on May 6, 2013.

  • Tweet

TOP ARTICLE CATEGORIES

  • BUSINESS

  • COVID-19

  • LABOR & EMPLOYMENT

  • FAMILY LAW

  • GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

  • LITIGATION

Subscribe to Blogs and Updates

Address:

6849 Old Dominion Dr #220
McLean, VA 22101

Hours of Operation:

Mon – Fri, 8AM – 5PM

Phone Number:

+1 703-556-0411


  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • DISCLAIMER
  • SITEMAP
  • CONTACT US
  • MAKE A PAYMENT

General Counsel, P.C. BBB Business Review

© 2023 General Counsel, P.C. | Website Design & Development by High Level Thinkers

TOP