General Counsel, P.C.

  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Business Breakups in Virginia
      • Minority Shareholder Protections
      • Emerging Companies
      • Entity Formation
      • Foreign Companies Entering U.S. Market
      • Real Estate and Leases
      • Starting a Business, Licensing & Compliance
      • Registered Agent Services
      • Succession Planning for Business Owners
      • Tax Law Matters
      • Charitable Solicitation Practice Group
      • Intellectual Property
        • Trade Secrets
        • Copyright
        • Trademark
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Documentation
        • Building Your Cornerstone
        • Employee Document Vault
        • Employee Handbook Tuneup Services
        • Guidelines for Hiring or Firing Employees
        • Separation Agreements
      • Drug Testing
        • Drug Testing Your Workforce – Best Practices
        • Laws Affecting Drug Testing Policies
      • Regulatory Issues
        • VA, MD, DC, Rights & Obligations
        • Age Discrimination
        • Americans with Disabilities Act
        • At-Will Employment
        • Fair Labor Standards Act
        • Family Medical Leave Act
        • Pregnancy Discrimination Act
        • Title VII
      • Non-Competition Agreements
        • District of Columbia
        • Maryland
        • Virginia
      • For Employers of Uniformed Services Members
      • Employer Considerations For Government Contractors
      • For Non-Profits
    • Family Law
      • Divorce
        • Grounds for Divorce
          • Fourth Level Menu Sample
        • High Net Divorce
        • Same Sex Divorce
        • Military Divorce
        • Uncontested Divorce
        • Litigation vs. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Divorce
        • Post-Divorce Enforcement and Appeals
        • Alimony and Spousal Support
        • Child Custody
        • Child Support
        • Filing for Divorce in Virginia
        • Divorce Security Clearance
      • Property Division
      • Alimony and Spousal Support
      • Child Support
      • Child Custody and Visitation
      • Marital Agreements
      • International Family Law
      • Domestic Violence and Protective Orders
      • Co-Parenting in Virginia
    • Government Contracts
      • Bid Protests
      • Government Contract Claims and Appeals
      • Getting Government Contracts: Small Business Certification Services
        • 8(a) Small Business
        • HUBZone Small Business
        • SDVOSB Program
        • Veteran-Owned Small Business
        • Women-Owned Small Business
    • Litigation
      • Arbitration, Mediation & Alternative Dispute Resolution Attorneys
      • Commercial & Business Litigation
      • Defamation
      • Employment Disputes
      • Government Contracting Disputes
      • Intellectual Property Disputes
      • Local Counsel
      • Pre-Litigation
    • Estate Planning
      • Estate Planning FAQs
      • Trusts
      • Wills
      • Families With Children
      • Business Succession Planning
      • Asset Protection Planning
      • Celebrity Estate Planning Mistakes
      • Legal Business Contingency Plans
      • Become a Referral Partner
    • Probate Administration
      • Probate is Complex – FAQ and Answers
      • Trust & Estate Litigation
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Biographies
      • Andrew “Andy” Baxter
      • Matthew Brennan
      • Heba K. Carter
      • Joanna Foard
      • Erika Gnazzo
      • Merritt Green
      • Elizabeth Hart
      • David Kaye
      • Craig Lawless
      • David Proano
      • Evan St. John
    • How We Help
  • Resources
    • Practical Counsel Blog
    • Bid Protest Weekly
    • VetWorking
    • COVID Compliance Plans
    • Virginia COVID Workplace Safety and Health Standards
    • Video Library
    • Webinars
    • Quotes in The News
    • GCPC First Generation Law Student Scholarship
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Make Payments
703-556-0411

Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policy Upheld by Texas Federal Court

Monday, 12 July 2021 / Published in Coronavirus Covid-19, Labor & Employment

Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policy Upheld by Texas Federal Court

Employers can mandate Covid-19 Vaccination for Employees

In a recent case, a Texas federal District Court upheld an employer’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. There, employees of a Texas hospital sued the hospital, claiming the policy violated Texas public policy and federal law, and that termination of employees who refused to get the vaccine would constitute wrongful termination. The court dismissed the employees’ case, upholding the mandate. This is the first court opinion discussing such policies and is favorable to employers with similar policies.

Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital

April 1, 2021, Houston Methodist Hospital announced a new policy requiring all employees be vaccinated against COVID-19 by June 7, 2021 or face termination. 117 employees, including Jennifer Bridges, sued to block the requirement and resulting terminations.

Bridges argued that the available COVID-19 vaccinations are “experimental and dangerous.” The court pointed out that “[t]his claim is false, and it is also irrelevant.” The court also noted that “vaccine safety and efficacy [were] not considered” when the court made its determination.

Under Texas law, employees are only protected from termination “for refusing to commit an act carrying criminal penalties to the worker.” Additionally, to succeed on a wrongful termination claim, in Texas, Bridges must show: (1) she was required to commit an illegal act carrying criminal penalties; (2) she refused to engage in the illegality; (3) she was discharged; and (4) the only reason for the discharge was her refusal to commit an unlawful act. Since receiving the COVID-19 vaccine is not an illegal act and doesn’t carry a criminal penalty, her wrongful termination claim must fail.

Additionally, Bridges argued that requiring the vaccine violates public policy. However, the court noted that Texas does not recognize the public policy exception to at-will employment. The court held that even if Texas did recognize the public policy exception, it wouldn’t apply, because the vaccine requirement “is consistent with public policy.” The court pointed to previous Supreme Court decisions which found that involuntary quarantine for contagious diseases and state-imposed requirements of mandatory vaccination do not violate due process. The court also pointed to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC”) recent guidance as support, although EEOC guidance is not binding. On May 28, 2021, the EEOC said that employers can require that employees be vaccinated against COVID-19, subject to reasonable accommodations for employees with sincerely held religious beliefs or disabilities that preclude vaccination.

Bridges also argued that the vaccination requirement violates federal law because it forces employees to either be vaccinated or fired. However, the court clarified that this isn’t coercion. The court determined that the hospital made a choice to do their business, while keeping staff, patients, and their families safe. The court noted that employees are free to accept or refuse the vaccine. The court analogized that “if a worker refuses an assignment, changed office, earlier start time, or other directive, he may be properly fired.” The court continued by holding that “every employment includes limits on the worker’s behavior in exchange for his remuneration. That is all part of the bargain.”

What Does Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital Mean for Employers?

While a Texas case may not seem relevant to Virginia employers, it sheds light on how courts across the nation may view mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies for employees. This case is the first opinion addressing whether or not employers can require employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. While this case is not binding on Virginia courts, it may be an indication of how other courts will view similar issues. The ruling was favorable to employers, upholding an employer’s mandatory vaccination policy. Notably, the court found that such vaccine policies are consistent with public policy. However, this case dealt with a healthcare provider employer. It’s not yet clear if courts will view such policies outside of the healthcare sector differently. Regardless, this case, as well as the May EEOC guidance, seems to support mandatory vaccination policies, provided required exceptions are included, consistent with federal and state employment law.

Employers with mandatory COVID-19 vaccine policies already in place, or employers considering instituting such policies, should be sure to include provisions for reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities or sincerely held religious beliefs that preclude vaccination.

Employers should continue to monitor guidance from state and local governments to ensure they stay in compliance with any changing recommendations or regulations. Attorneys at GCPC will continue to monitor recommendations and legislation. For additional guidance, contact the employment law experts at General Counsel, PC today at 703-991-7973.

 

  • Tweet

TOP ARTICLE CATEGORIES

  • BUSINESS

  • COVID-19

  • LABOR & EMPLOYMENT

  • FAMILY LAW

  • GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

  • LITIGATION

Subscribe to Blogs and Updates

Address:

6849 Old Dominion Dr #220
McLean, VA 22101

Hours of Operation:

Mon – Fri, 8AM – 5PM

Phone Number:

+1 703-556-0411


  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • DISCLAIMER
  • SITEMAP
  • CONTACT US
  • MAKE A PAYMENT

General Counsel, P.C. BBB Business Review

© 2023 General Counsel, P.C. | Website Design & Development by High Level Thinkers

TOP