General Counsel, P.C.

  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Business Breakups in Virginia
      • Minority Shareholder Protections
      • Emerging Companies
      • Entity Formation
      • Foreign Companies Entering U.S. Market
      • Real Estate and Leases
      • Starting a Business, Licensing & Compliance
      • Registered Agent Services
      • Succession Planning for Business Owners
      • Tax Law Matters
      • Charitable Solicitation Practice Group
      • Intellectual Property
        • Trade Secrets
        • Copyright
        • Trademark
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Documentation
        • Building Your Cornerstone
        • Employee Document Vault
        • Employee Handbook Tuneup Services
        • Guidelines for Hiring or Firing Employees
        • Separation Agreements
      • Drug Testing
        • Drug Testing Your Workforce – Best Practices
        • Laws Affecting Drug Testing Policies
      • Regulatory Issues
        • VA, MD, DC, Rights & Obligations
        • Age Discrimination
        • Americans with Disabilities Act
        • At-Will Employment
        • Fair Labor Standards Act
        • Family Medical Leave Act
        • Pregnancy Discrimination Act
        • Title VII
      • Non-Competition Agreements
        • District of Columbia
        • Maryland
        • Virginia
      • For Employers of Uniformed Services Members
      • Employer Considerations For Government Contractors
      • For Non-Profits
    • Family Law Attorneys
      • Divorce
        • Grounds for Divorce
        • High Net Divorce
        • Same Sex Divorce
        • Military Divorce
        • Uncontested Divorce
        • Litigation vs. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Divorce
        • Post-Divorce Enforcement and Appeals
        • Alimony and Spousal Support
        • Child Custody
        • Child Support
        • Filing for Divorce in Virginia
      • Property Division
      • Alimony and Spousal Support
      • Child Support
      • Child Custody and Visitation
      • Marital Agreements
      • International Family Law
      • Domestic Violence and Protective Orders
      • Co-Parenting in Virginia
    • Government Contracts
      • Bid Protests
      • Government Contract Claims and Appeals
      • Getting Government Contracts: Small Business Certification Services
        • 8(a) Small Business
        • HUBZone Small Business
        • SDVOSB Program
        • Veteran-Owned Small Business
        • Women-Owned Small Business
    • Litigation
      • Arbitration, Mediation & Alternative Dispute Resolution Attorneys
      • Commercial & Business Litigation
      • Employment Disputes
      • Government Contracting Disputes
      • Intellectual Property Disputes
      • Local Counsel
      • Pre-Litigation
    • White Collar Crime
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Biographies
      • Andrew “Andy” Baxter
      • Matthew Brennan
      • Hailey Render Brown
      • Christopher D. Davis
      • Joanna Foard
      • Merritt Green
      • Elizabeth Hart
      • David Kaye
      • Samer B. Korkor
      • David Proano
      • Evan St. John
      • Lewis Rhodes
    • How We Help
  • Resources
    • Practical Counsel Blog
    • Bid Protest Weekly
    • COVID Compliance Plans
    • Virginia COVID Workplace Safety and Health Standards
    • Video Library
    • Webinars
    • Quotes in The News
    • GCPC First Generation Law Student Scholarship
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Make Payments
703.556.0411

Employment Law: Religious Accommodation, Hand-Scanners, and the “Mark of the Beast”

Friday, 30 June 2017 / Published in Labor & Employment, Non-Profit

Employment Law: Religious Accommodation, Hand-Scanners, and the “Mark of the Beast”

Employment Law Case: EEOC v. Consol Energy, Inc., No. 16-1230, (4th Cir. June 12, 2017)

Employment Law Issues: Title VII Religious Discrimination, Constructive Discharge

Court Holding: The Circuit Court affirmed the District Court’s ruling that the plaintiff-employee had suffered constructive discharge and Title VII religious discrimination due to his employer’s failure to accommodate his religious beliefs.

Employment Counsel: Even if an employer does not intend for an employee to leave as a result of its policies, an employer who fails to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs can make the work environment intolerable to that employee. In such a situation, a court might find that an employee was constructively discharged as a result of his employer’s failure to accommodate his religious convictions.

Employment Law Case Summary:

Beverly Butcher worked for 37 years in a coal mine operated by Consol Energy. When Consol implemented a biometric hand-scanner system to track employees’ hours in the mine, Butcher objected to using the system.  He believed that his Evangelical Christian faith warned against receiving the “Mark of the Beast” and that such a system placed a mark on employees that doomed them to serve the Antichrist. Since Consol did not accommodate Butcher’s objection, he retired. On behalf of Butcher, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission brought a Title VII action against the company for failing to accommodate Butcher’s religious beliefs and constructively discharging him.

At trial, the jury determined that Butcher had met all three elements of a Title VII reasonable religious accommodation claim:

(1) He had a sincere religious belief that conflicted with Consol’s hand scanner system;

(2) Butcher notified Consol of the conflict; and

(3) Consol’s refusal to accommodate Butcher amounted to a constructive discharge. Moreover, as evidenced by Consol’s accommodation of two other employees with hand injuries, Consol would not have incurred an undue hardship or cost to accommodate Butcher.

Consol appealed the decision arguing that Butcher did not meet the first and third prongs of the religious accommodation claim. As to the first prong, Consol argued that there was no conflict between Butcher’s Evangelical beliefs and the hand scanner.  In response, the Circuit Court emphasized that it is not for the employer or for the court to assess the legitimacy of religious convictions.

As to the third prong, Consol argued that it did not constructively discharge Butcher because he voluntarily retired. The Court disagreed. It reasoned that an employee is constructively discharged when an “employer deliberately makes the working conditions of the employee intolerable.”  Although Consol argued that there was not enough intention to satisfy a constructive discharge’s “deliberate” element, the Court pointed to the recent Supreme Court case, Green v. Brennan, that rejected an intent requirement and emphasized that an employee should not have to present proof that his employer’s discrimination was really a covert scheme to force him to quit.

For additional information about this case or other employment law matters, please contact Merritt Green at mgreen@gcpc.com or (703) 556-6505.  Mr. Green leads General Counsel, P.C.’s Employment Law Practice and has been representing employers (and occasionally employees) for over 18 years.

  • Tweet

TOP ARTICLE CATEGORIES

  • BUSINESS

  • COVID-19

  • EMPLOYMENT

  • FAMILY LAW

  • GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

  • LITIGATION

Subscribe to Blogs and Updates

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • DISCLAIMER
  • SITEMAP
  • CONTACT US
  • MAKE A PAYMENT

General Counsel, P.C. BBB Business Review

© 2021 General Counsel, P.C. | Website Design & Development by High Level Thinkers

TOP