General Counsel, P.C.

  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Business Breakups in Virginia
      • Minority Shareholder Protections
      • Emerging Companies
      • Entity Formation
      • Foreign Companies Entering U.S. Market
      • Real Estate and Leases
      • Starting a Business, Licensing & Compliance
      • Registered Agent Services
      • Succession Planning for Business Owners
      • Tax Law Matters
      • Charitable Solicitation Practice Group
      • Intellectual Property
        • Trade Secrets
        • Copyright
        • Trademark
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Documentation
        • Building Your Cornerstone
        • Employee Document Vault
        • Employee Handbook Tuneup Services
        • Guidelines for Hiring or Firing Employees
        • Separation Agreements
      • Drug Testing
        • Drug Testing Your Workforce – Best Practices
        • Laws Affecting Drug Testing Policies
      • Regulatory Issues
        • VA, MD, DC, Rights & Obligations
        • Age Discrimination
        • Americans with Disabilities Act
        • At-Will Employment
        • Fair Labor Standards Act
        • Family Medical Leave Act
        • Pregnancy Discrimination Act
        • Title VII
      • Non-Competition Agreements
        • District of Columbia
        • Maryland
        • Virginia
      • For Employers of Uniformed Services Members
      • Employer Considerations For Government Contractors
      • For Non-Profits
    • Family Law
      • Divorce
        • Grounds for Divorce
        • High Net Divorce
        • Same Sex Divorce
        • Military Divorce
        • Uncontested Divorce
        • Litigation vs. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Divorce
        • Post-Divorce Enforcement and Appeals
        • Alimony and Spousal Support
        • Child Custody
        • Child Support
        • Filing for Divorce in Virginia
        • Divorce Security Clearance
      • Property Division
      • Alimony and Spousal Support
      • Child Support
      • Child Custody and Visitation
      • Marital Agreements
      • International Family Law
      • Domestic Violence and Protective Orders
      • Co-Parenting in Virginia
    • Government Contracts
      • Bid Protests
      • Government Contract Claims and Appeals
      • Getting Government Contracts: Small Business Certification Services
        • 8(a) Small Business
        • HUBZone Small Business
        • SDVOSB Program
        • Veteran-Owned Small Business
        • Women-Owned Small Business
    • Litigation
      • Arbitration, Mediation & Alternative Dispute Resolution Attorneys
      • Commercial & Business Litigation
      • Employment Disputes
      • Government Contracting Disputes
      • Intellectual Property Disputes
      • Local Counsel
      • Pre-Litigation
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Biographies
      • Andrew “Andy” Baxter
      • Matthew Brennan
      • Hailey Render Brown
      • Christopher D. Davis
      • Joanna Foard
      • Merritt Green
      • Elizabeth Hart
      • David Kaye
      • David Proano
      • Evan St. John
      • Lewis Rhodes
    • How We Help
  • Resources
    • Practical Counsel Blog
    • Bid Protest Weekly
    • VetWorking
    • COVID Compliance Plans
    • Virginia COVID Workplace Safety and Health Standards
    • Video Library
    • Webinars
    • Quotes in The News
    • GCPC First Generation Law Student Scholarship
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Make Payments
703.556.0411

Department of Labor Clarifies Test for Classifying Employees and Independent Contractors under FLSA

Thursday, 07 January 2021 / Published in Employment, Labor & Employment, News

Department of Labor Clarifies Test for Classifying Employees and Independent Contractors under FLSA

The line between employee and independent contractor has historically been unclear. However, on January 6, the Department of Labor (DOL) provided clarification on the test for employee versus independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The “final rule” streamlines and clarifies the test and should “reduce worker misclassification, reduce litigation, increase efficiency, and increase job satisfaction and flexibility” according to the Wage and Hour Division. The new rule becomes effective March 8, 2021.

The rule confirms that the “economic reality” test is used to determine whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee. The key question is whether the individual is in business for himself or is economically dependent on a potential employer for work. The rule explains two core factors that are most probative for making this determination: 

  • The nature and degree of control over the work  
    • This factor weighs in favor of an individual being an independent contractor to the extent the individual “exercises substantial control over key aspects of the performance of the work, such as by setting his or her own schedule, by selecting his or her projects, and/or through the ability to work for others, which might include the potential employer’s competitors.” 
    • Alternatively, this factor weighs in favor of an individual being an employee to the extent the potential employer “exercises substantial control over key aspects of the performance of the work, such as by controlling the individual’s schedule or workload and/or by directly or indirectly requiring the individual to work exclusively for the potential employer.”
  • The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative and/or investment. 
    • This factor “weighs towards the individual being an employee to the extent the individual is unable to affect his or her earnings or is only able to do so by working more hours or more efficiently.”

If both of these factors point to the same classification, “there is a substantial likelihood that that classification is appropriate.” However, there are three other factors that can provide additional guidance in the analysis, especially if the core factors point to inconsistent classifications: 

  • The amount of skill required for the work
      • If an individual uses skills or training not provided by the potential employer, the individual is more likely an independent contractor.
  • The degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and potential employer; and 
      • Employment arrangements that are definite in duration, such as for a specific amount of time or a specific project, or that are unpredictable and sporadic, are more likely to be independent contracting relationships.
  • Whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 
      • If an individual is “a component of a potential employer’s integrated production process, whether for goods or services” or is an integral part of the employer’s core business, then the individual is more likely an employee.

The rule also clarifies that the actual practice of the worker and potential employer is more relevant than what may be contractually or theoretically possible. Finally, the rule provides 6 scenarios applying the factors as examples.

*** NOTE:  Since this regulation was issued during the final days of the Trump Administration, it is possible, perhaps even likely, that the Biden Administration may seek to delay its implementation.  ***

For more information or guidance on how your business may be affected by this new rule, call General Counsel, P.C. today at 703-991-7973.

  • Tweet
Tagged under: Department of Labor, DOL, Employee, FLSA, Independent Contractor, March 2021

TOP ARTICLE CATEGORIES

  • BUSINESS

  • COVID-19

  • EMPLOYMENT

  • FAMILY LAW

  • GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

  • LITIGATION

Subscribe to Blogs and Updates

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • DISCLAIMER
  • SITEMAP
  • CONTACT US
  • MAKE A PAYMENT

General Counsel, P.C. BBB Business Review

© 2021 General Counsel, P.C. | Website Design & Development by High Level Thinkers

TOP